Loading...
Columbia naturalism and the analytic turn: Eclipse or synthesis?
Verhaegh,Sander
Verhaegh,Sander
Abstract
Historical reconstructions of the effects of the intellectual migrationare typically informed by one of two conflicting narratives. Some scholars arguethat the logical positivists contributed to the demise of distinctly American schools of thought. Others reject this “eclipse view” and argue that analytic philosophy can best be characterized as a synthesis of American and positivist views. This paper studies the fate of one of the most influential schools of U.S. philosophy—Columbia naturalism—and argues that both narratives are part of a larger story. First, I reconstruct the rise of the school, focusing on its naturalist analyses of science, morality, and religion. Next, I trace some of the naturalists’ contacts with German philosophers and show that they encountered a bifurcation between historical and scientific philosophy in their discussions. I argue that a similar distinction gradually infected debates between naturalists, eventually resulting in a split within the Columbia school itself. The historically-oriented naturalists were overshadowed by the analytic movement, while the science-minded naturalists incorporated the views of the émigrés, thereby developing the tradition in new directions.
Description
Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
De Gruyter
Files
Loading...
Columbia_naturalism.pdf
Adobe PDF, 266.66 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Citation
Verhaegh, S 2025, Columbia naturalism and the analytic turn : Eclipse or synthesis? in American philosophy and the intellectual migration : Pragmatism, logical empiricism, phenomenology, critical theory. vol. 1, De Gruyter History of Philosophy and Science, De Gruyter, pp. 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111335209-006
License
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess