Why there is less supportive evidence for contact theory than they say there is: A quantitative cultural–sociological critique
Manevska,Katerina Achterberg,P.H.J. Houtman,Dick
Manevska,Katerina
Achterberg,P.H.J.
Houtman,Dick
Abstract
The finding that ethnic prejudice is particularly weakly developed among those with interethnic friendships is often construed as confirming the so-called ‘contact theory,’ which holds that interethnic contact reduces racial prejudice. This theory raises cultural–sociological suspicions, however, because of its tendency to reduce culture to an allegedly ‘more fundamental’ realm of social interaction. Analyzing data from the first wave of the European Social Survey, we therefore test the theory alongside an alternative cultural–sociological theory about culturally driven processes of contact selection. We find that whereas interethnic friendships are indeed culturally driven, which confirms our cultural–sociological theory, contacts with neighbors and colleagues do indeed affect ethnic prejudice. They do so in a manner that is more complex and more culturally sensitive than contact theory suggests, however: while positive cultural stances vis-à-vis ethnic diversity lead interethnic contact to decrease ethnic prejudice, negative ones rather lead the former to increase the latter.
Description
Date
2018
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Citation
Manevska, K, Achterberg, P H J & Houtman, D 2018, 'Why there is less supportive evidence for contact theory than they say there is : A quantitative cultural–sociological critique', American Journal of Cultural Sociology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0028-8
License
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess