Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology
Asendorpf,J.B. Conner,M. de Fruyt,F. de Houwer,J. Denissen,J.J.A. Fiedler,K. Fiedler,S. Funder,D.C. Kliegl,R. Nosek,B.A.
Asendorpf,J.B.
Conner,M.
de Fruyt,F.
de Houwer,J.
Denissen,J.J.A.
Fiedler,K.
Fiedler,S.
Funder,D.C.
Kliegl,R.
Nosek,B.A.
Abstract
Replicability of findings is at the heart of any empirical science. The aim of this article is to move the current replicability debate in psychology towards concrete recommendations for improvement. We focus on research practices but also offer guidelines for reviewers, editors, journal management, teachers, granting institutions, and university promotion committees, highlighting some of the emerging and existing practical solutions that can facilitate implementation of these recommendations. The challenges for improving replicability in psychological science are systemic. Improvement can occur only if changes are made at many levels of practice, evaluation, and reward.
Description
Date
2013
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Citation
Asendorpf, J B, Conner, M, de Fruyt, F, de Houwer, J, Denissen, J J A, Fiedler, K, Fiedler, S, Funder, D C, Kliegl, R, Nosek, B A, Perugini, M, Roberts, B W, Schmitt, M, van Aken, M A G, Weber, H & Wicherts, J M 2013, 'Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology', European Journal of Personality, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919