Loading...
Satisfactory results of a psychometric analysis and calculation of minimal clinically important differences of the world health organization quality of life BREF questionnaire in an observational cohort study with lung cancer and mesothelioma patients
de Mol,M. Visser,S. Aerts,J.G.J.V. Lodder,P. de Vries,J. den Oudsten,B.L.
de Mol,M.
Visser,S.
Aerts,J.G.J.V.
Lodder,P.
de Vries,J.
den Oudsten,B.L.
Abstract
Background To determine the psychometric properties and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) in advanced stage lung cancer patients. Methods Patients (n = 153) completed the WHOQOL-BREF and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed and reliability and construct validity determined. MCIDs were estimated with two distribution-based methods (0.5 standard deviation (SD) and 1 standard error of measurement (1 SEM)). Results CFA confirmed WHOQOL-BREF domain structure. All domains demonstrated good internal consistency (α > 0.70), except Social Relationships (α = 0.57). Nineteen of the 24 WHOQOL-BREF items had correlations of ≥ 0.40 with their intended domain. Four items had higher correlations with a domain other than their intended domain. Moderate to strong correlations were observed for corresponding domains of the two questionnaires, except for the social domains (r = 0.07). For 0.5 SD, MCIDs ranged from 0.88 to 1.55, and for 1 SEM MCIDs ranged from 1.76 to 2.72. Conclusions The WHOQOL-BREF has satisfactory psychometric properties in patients with advanced stage lung cancer, whereas the observed MCIDs provide a method for interpretation of scores.
Description
Date
2018
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
BEVACIZUMAB, CHEMOTHERAPY, EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, INSTRUMENT, INTRAINDIVIDUAL CHANGES, Lung cancer, METAANALYSIS, Minimal clinically important difference, NEWLY-DIAGNOSED PATIENTS, OF-LIFE, Quality of life, Reliability, SUPPORTIVE CARE, Validity, World Health Organization quality of life-BREF, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
de Mol, M, Visser, S, Aerts, J G J V, Lodder, P, de Vries, J & den Oudsten, B L 2018, 'Satisfactory results of a psychometric analysis and calculation of minimal clinically important differences of the world health organization quality of life BREF questionnaire in an observational cohort study with lung cancer and mesothelioma patients', BMC Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, 1173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4793-8