An unconditional basic income?: How Dutch citizens justify their opinions about a basic income and work conditionality
Rossetti,Federica Roosma,Femke Laenen,Tijs Abts,Koen
Rossetti,Federica
Roosma,Femke
Laenen,Tijs
Abts,Koen
Abstract
The article focuses on one of the core but controversial features of a universal basic income (UBI): its unconditionality. Using qualitative in-depth interviews collected in the Dutch municipality of Tilburg in 2018–2019, we examine the arguments underlying popular opinions about a UBI and work conditionality. The analysis suggests that these arguments can be interpreted from two theoretical perspectives. On the one hand, respondents make frequent use of deservingness criteria referring to the characteristics of welfare recipients, such as their need and work willingness. On the other hand, they justify their opinions using arguments related to the characteristics of welfare schemes, such as their administrative and financial feasibility. Our findings offer important insights concerning political actors who support (or oppose) the real-world implementation of a UBI.
Description
Funding Information: This work was supported by the Research Foundation FWO - Flanders (Grant Number G068816N) and by Internal Funds KU Leuven (under Grant PDM/19/023).
Date
2020
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Basic income, in-depth interviews, public opinion, the Netherlands, work conditionality
Citation
Rossetti, F, Roosma, F, Laenen, T & Abts, K 2020, 'An unconditional basic income? How Dutch citizens justify their opinions about a basic income and work conditionality', Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.15
License
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess