Distinguishing between models for extreme and midpoint response styles as opposite poles of a single dimension versus two separate dimensions: A simulation study
Schoenmakers,Martijn Bolsinova,Maria Tijmstra,Jesper
Schoenmakers,Martijn
Bolsinova,Maria
Tijmstra,Jesper
Abstract
Extreme and midpoint response styles have frequently been found to decrease the validity of Likert-type questionnaire results. Different approaches for modelling extreme and midpoint responding have been proposed in the literature, with some advocating for a unidimensional conceptualization of the response styles as opposite poles, and others modelling them as separate dimensions. How these response styles are modelled influences the estimation complexity, parameter estimates, and detection of and correction for response styles in IRT models. For these reasons, we examine if it is possible to empirically distinguish between extreme and midpoint responding as two separate dimensions versus two opposite sides of a single dimension. The various conceptualizations are modelled using the multidimensional nominal response model, with the AIC and BIC being used to distinguish between the competing models in a simulation study and an empirical example. Results indicate good performance of both information criteria given sufficient sample size, test length, and response style strength. The BIC outperformed the AIC in cases where no response styles were present, while the AIC outperformed the BIC in cases where multiple response style dimensions were present. Implications of the results for practice are discussed.
Description
Date
2025-09-13
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
response styles, extreme response style, midpoint response style, item response theory, multidimensional nominal response model, simulation study
Citation
Schoenmakers, M, Bolsinova, M & Tijmstra, J 2025, 'Distinguishing between models for extreme and midpoint response styles as opposite poles of a single dimension versus two separate dimensions : A simulation study', Applied Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251379471
License
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess