Thumbnail Image
Item

In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity: Response to radder

de Ridder,J.
; 
Bouter,L.
; 
Haven,T.
; 
Peels,R.
; 
Tijdink,J.
; 
Zeegers,M.P.
Abstract
We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.
Description
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Collections
Tilburg University Research Output Collection
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
MTO_Haven_In_Defense_of_the_Netherlands_Code_of_Conduct_for_Research_Integrity_AiR_2023.pdf
Adobe PDF, 578.75 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Mertonian norms, Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity, Research Integrity, Responsible research and innovation, Patenting
Citation
de Ridder, J, Bouter, L, Haven, T, Peels, R, Tijdink, J & Zeegers, M P 2023, 'In defense of the Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity : Response to radder', Accountability in Research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14602/79761
Embedded videos